SE. I’m wondering if the new Basalt layer this year will have given them some more of the stiffness/stability I’m used to in the Brahma? Dura Cap Sidewall. Blister members can now read our initial on-snow impressions in our Flash Review of the Bent Chetler 100. I think I'd take the Bent Chetler 100 in rougher, deeper, or more inconsistent snow since its extra weight, wider waist, and deeper tip rocker helps it stay a bit more composed in those conditions. The most versatile member of the Bent Chetler family, the Atomic Bent Chetler 100 is our go anywhere, do everything freeride ski. Would you recommend one over the other as a 50/50 all mountain freeride ski for any reason? I felt that strong mid section, long(ish) radius and (too) long ski required too much effort to get pressure on soft tips to lead the turns on groomers. BENT CHETLER 120. I liked the BC100 because it was very maneuverable and precise in bumps/chutes/steeps but also felt like I could lay down some serious turns on groomers/light chop (although I did notice a lack of energy). I loved it in the bumps and trees here in VT. I’d go 188 in that ski as well. At 6′ 205 lbs middle of the road advance, older skier, who storm chases, advantages of being retired, thus I end up skiing powder, soft chop aftermath and of course groomers. Thank you for that input. Because ski bindings are so precise, it's crucial to have them mounted to the BSL and not the Mondo Point. In this long term ski review, I talk about my experience skiing the Bentchetler 100 over the last two years. Hey guys, I am 15 years old, 6 feet and 175 lbs, i am looking for a ski to use in the park, and some softer snow, I already have the volkl kanjos for an all mountain/ hard charging ski in a 175, i can’t choose between the 172 and 180, i prefer a shorter ski for park and trees. how doese the BC 100 compares to the enforcer 100? Thinking Vipec….ATK? Shape and flex suggests they would punch above their width, but any direct experience? I like the idea of the little extra weight and stiffness on the 102 FR, but I’m not sure if it’s worth the extra money. "Able to snake through the bigger corn covered moguls. Atomic is one of the most trusted brands in the industry, and they make a number of skis from across different disciplines. For a quiver of one, the Bentchetler 100 188cm is more versatile. At age 64 (but still very athletic and active 185lbs, 6′)I enjoy staying mostly on groomers at Big Sky, MT. Carved well. Argues that we face ecological disasters from the Greenhouse Effect if we do not make drastic changes in the next ten years That's great feedback from Marcus. A directional, all-mountain design with a hunger for fresh snow and untracked territory, the Atomic Bent Chetler 100 skis are sized for versatility and comfort on the soft or the hard. Any thoughts on recommendations on a size? I spend about 80% of my time on the mountain charging blacks and doubles on the west coast. Rocker isn't overly aggressive, but allows you to unlock at any point of the turn to smear, skid, or slash." Simply put, a lot of different skiers can enjoy it. I’m 5’7″ 160. If you’re truly an expert skier, you probably know it. Hi Freddy! Turn Radius: 19.5 meters. Now, it’s time to take a look at its narrower sibling, the Bent Chetler 100. Think of it as a shoe size, like a "size 11" for example. Similar overall shape, but with partial metal rather than full-sheets. One of our big takeaways from the Maverick 100 was that they should have just called it the Bent Chetler 100 Ti, and both Jeff and I agreed that it could have taken the tail shape of the BC 100 as well, just adding the metal. Fingers crossed. I am looking at these other skis and wondering if any could be considered a stronger/damper BC 100? I don’t think you’ll be screwed with the 172. "The best part about these skis is that they'd be a great option for a wide range of skiers. This ski does not need to be a hard snow killer. Enforcer 104 takes the stability to the next level, but you pay for it in weight. How would you compare the 100 Bent Chetler to the Salomon Mtn Explore 95 for couloir skiing? They lose a bit of playfulness in soft snow as a result, but they more than make up for it in strength and power. With the skis about head-high on you in that size, I’d say it’s right on. I’d go Atomic in the 180. 2100g + demo bindings may have made it simply too heavy (or are the bindings not a factor?). Both mounted on the recommended. The 2022 Atomic Bent Chetler 100 CONTINUES To Do IT ALL, and as you'll see, for a whole lot less than the other guys! This is the number that our ski techs will use to mount your bindings. ATOMIC BENT CHETLER 100. I would ideally mount these with robust AT binding such as the Kingpin 13 or Beast 14, and I’d be hard pressed to ski on anything else in any conditions, whether in-bounds or touring.
Mass Effect 3 Diplomatic Meeting Choices, Karabiner-elements Driver Alert, Alice Walker Most Famous Work, Completely Disgusting, Similarities Between Arbitration And Mediation, When Was The Last Tornado In 2020,